☰ Menu eFinancialCareers

GUEST COMMENT: An anthropological investigation of the managerial types in the middle office of an investment bank

Middle office man

Needless to say, there’s no revenue generation in the middle office. In my opinion this makes for a more political environment: promotion is all about who you know and how much they like you.

For my sins, I have worked in a variety of jobs in the middle office. In the process, I have come across a variety of managers, most of whom can be fitted into one of several categories. These include:

1. The manager who arrived as an analyst/associate, worked hard, was competent, motivated, and engaged socially with his/her seniors and achieved promotion at an appropriate pace.

Often very professional. Unfortunately not very likeable.

2. The manager who was recruited externally, from a non-management (or unofficial management type position) often in another asset class.

Usually has weak technical knowledge and is capable only of writing emails. These managers can often delegate almost EVERYTHING. Blame for not meeting targets is attributed to everyone except themselves.

3. The manager who was promoted internally, for the wrong reasons.

Within middle office divisions there is often a culture of, ‘making yourself seen/heard.’ This will often manifest as childish/moronic observations in dull divisional meetings. These people are frequently incompetent to a degree that could pose a serious level of operational risk.  PowerPoint professionals, they will spend their days interacting with people on a face to face basis leaving no audit trail. Confirm anything they say in an email.

4. The happy-go-lucky manager, who likes to be liked by colleagues, not too strict, reaches a sufficient proportion of targets, didn’t actively search out management but was there when the opportunity was available.

He or she will do his/her utmost to defend colleagues. Actually quite pleasant to work with.

5. The middle office manager from a more prestigious bank.

This person has often worked at a US bulge bracket and will have moved to a lower tier European bank in search of better work-life balance. He will speak frequently about procedures at a previous employer, before realizing that it’s not necessary to work so hard any more.  Can be bearable once this revelation has been achieved.

Comments (3)

Comments
  1. Following an extensive anthropological, sociological, psychological and blue-sky-illogical root-and-branch systemic survey of the counter-ideology of our current business strategy, Cityhag is giving up, going home and having a bloody large glass of Merlot.

  2. Sarah, this is the sort of post that would have generated a host of comments and reactions from readers in the past.

    Now there is nothing.

    Barely a single comment or view on any of the articles in the last 12 months.

  3. It’s not just in the Middle Office. I think it’s worse in IT. At least I find the Middle Office managers have better business knowledge. In IT, the more senior the managers are, the less they know about both business and IT! They are only doing human resource things like budgetting and resourcing for their departments, and to know the titles and deadlines of the main projects that are going on. Yet they hold the power to hire and fire people apart from themselves. It’s the developers and business analysts underneath who are doing the real work yet these people are seldom being acknowledged and appreciated.

The comment is under moderation. It will appear shortly.

React

Screen Name

Email

Consult our community guidelines here