☰ Menu eFinancialCareers

Seven Reasons to Feel Good about Yourself When Your Bonus is Zero

Luke Hildyard

It’s bonus time in investment banks. So what happens when you find out that instead of getting the five- or six-figure sum you were expecting, you receive nothing? We suggest that you tell yourself the following points.

1.  There’s nothing unusual about not getting a bonus

The bonus culture in the financial services industry is a curious phenomenon. Very few other sectors insist on massive performance-related payments above and beyond the salary they already receive for doing their job. Some of the most talented people in the country, performing some of the most vital roles – Doctors, Generals, High Court Judges, Senior Civil Servants, Cabinet Ministers, Police and Fire Brigade Chiefs – all manage to get by on their basic salary. They don’t require an additional reward for doing a job for which they are already handsomely remunerated relative to most of the population. So beyond the narrow confines of the banking sector, and compared to highly-talented people across the economy as a whole, there is nothing unusual or shameful about not receiving a bonus

2.   Obsessing over bonus size is shallow and hints at a lack of self-fulfillment

Different theories of human motivation generally put financial gain at the bottom of the list, with more mature aspirations relating to wider notions of fullfilment at the top. Abraham Maslow’s famous triangle of human needs, with health and security at its base and self-actualisation at its apex, is a classic example.  Once fundamental requirements like a warm, adequately-sized home, a decent diet, perhaps a reliable form of transport have been met, happier, more mature individuals tend to gravitate towards non-material goals. Contrastingly, there’s probably some deep, almost Freudian, sense of inadequacy driving the kind of people who constantly obsess over the size of their house or car or bonus.

3.  Inequality driven by large bonuses in the financial sector is damaging to society

The effects of inequality are now well-documented, and supported by a wealth of academic evidence. The Spirit Level by Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett shows how, in the developed world,  more unequal countries, such as Britain and the US, tend to suffer much worse social problems including obesity, teenage pregnancy, drug abuse and low social mobility, than their more equal counterparts, like Germany or the Nordic states. Similarly, Stewart Lansley, writing in the ‘Cost of Inequality’ highlights the damaging economic effects of inequality. When a tiny rich elite horde more of the country’s resources, they tend to channel it into property or other unproductive investments, whereas low and middle-income consumers spend all the money they have in the productive economy. So higher levels of inequality hinder economic growth. Research by Brian Bell and John Van Reenen from the London School of Economics shows that inequality in the UK, for example, is largely driven by high pay in the banking industry. Under that reasoning, any banker accepting a large bonus is contributing towards our biggest social and economic problems.

4.  Large bonuses are small-minded and parochial

In addition to being more socially aware (see above) bonus refuseniks are also more cosmopolitan and worldly-wise. The Cambridge economist Ha Joon Chang notes that the culture of high pay is most pronounced in the Anglo-Saxon economies of the US and the UK. Income inequality is also worse in these countries than other comparatively prosperous economies. This is not necessarily because of higher levels of taxation. In Sweden and Germany, for example, there is no greater wealth redistribution than in the UK – these countries are more equal to begin with, because there is not the same culture of equating wealth to status or achievement. Greed and extravagant riches way beyond one’s needs are less socially acceptable, and the expectation of enormous salaries or bonuses is more muted. Anyone not getting a bonus in 2013 can assert that they have adopted a similarly cosmopolitan outlook.

5. A bit of perspective…

World Bank Economist Branko Milovanovic reckons that an income of $34,000 puts you in the richest 1% worldwide. About 1.3 billion people survive on less than $1.25 a day, while 2.5 billion lack basic sanitation facilities – 3.4 million people, mainly children, die every year because of problems with drinking water or sanitation.  Even in the UK, bankers without bonuses are likely to be doing a lot better than most people at a time of punishing austerity and stagnant economic growth. Public servants earning £21k (well below the national average) are having to undergo real terms pay cut. Low-wage earners who receive tax credits, and the unemployed or disabled who receive social security support, will also see their incomes decline. Other members of the public who depend on services effected by public spending cuts, including women’s refuges, pre-school children’s centres or public libraries are likely to have little sympathy for anyone complaining about their lack of bonus.

6.  Bonuses don’t drive performance

As the comparisons with other sectors, or other countries show, bonuses probably don’t do much to improve performance.  So you don’t really need one.  A number of studies have confirmed their limited impact on performance. For example, the psychologist Kenneth Thomas noted that monetary rewards only motivated those in low-skilled, menial jobs where the participants lacked intrinsic motivation, most unlike the competitive world of banking, while the consultancy firm PWC, found that executives discount conditional pay packages, effectively assuming they won’t receive a potential bonus, meaning that the impact on their behaviour is weak, particularly if the bonus is deferred or issued in the form of shares.

7.  Your friends won’t denounce you in the street

For the benefit of anyone that hasn’t been living on one of the moons of Jupiter over the past five years, bankers and their bonuses are not viewed enormously favourably in the eyes of the general public. Media fury at ‘fatcats’ and ‘telephone number salaries’ has reached crescendo as bonuses soar while the economy slumps and inequality levels remain at their highest for thirty years.  Polling for the High Pay Commission suggests that 73% of people think that income differences in Britain are too large, while 60% think that ordinary working people do not get their fair share of the nation’s wealth.  As the days grow longer, the January snows melt and bonus season comes into view, it maybe much better for your popularity to be at one with those millions of unfortunate souls outside the banking sector who won’t have an extra windfall to anticipate.

Luke Hildyard is the head of research at the High Pay Centre, an independent non-party think tank which monitors pay at the top of the income distribution. 

Comments (2)

Comments
  1. I was upset to read the above most basic working investment staff don’t get paid 5/6 figure bonus and would be lucky with a 4 figure bonus. Also most of the talented people named are paid overtime. I work long hours and receive no overtime so a bonus in my mind is to show recognition for this time that we have to give with no pay.

    So when you tell people they should not be unhappy about not getting a bonus without really looking at all the facts of the majority of people working in the investment bank show to me someone that is narrow minded to the main work force in investment banking who don’t get large pay and bonus.

  2. An excellent article Luke, I fully concur with everything you say except your comments about social mobility, which I believe is caused mainly by bad education and a flawed benefits system, now at long last being addressed. Unfortunately among the banking fraternity, I fell that most of your comments will fall on deaf ears!

The comment is under moderation. It will appear shortly.

React

Screen Name

Email

Consult our community guidelines here