Job News & Views

Search

Post Your Resume

 

Print

Are Wall Street's Job Losses Overstated?

May 27 2009

Dona DeZube

Crain's New York Business argues Wall Street job losses have been exaggerated. Citing recent data from the New York Department of Labor, the newspaper says only 19,000 financial services jobs have disappeared from the Big Apple since August 2008.

Sure, three of the five largest investment banks are gone, and Citigroup and AIG are now wards of the state. And yes, there has been severe contraction, including painful job cuts, especially in capital markets, real estate and mergers and acquisitions. But Manhattan's financial district hasn't been mothballed. Not yet, anyway.

While experts, including Rae Rosen at the New York Fed, tell the newspaper severance packages with weekly payouts are keeping phantom employees on the payroll, we at eFinancialCareers News have heard of few long-term severance payouts. Some observers credit the Troubled Asset Relief Program for saving jobs, or suggest foreign institutions and boutiques are picking up benched talent.

When it comes to job loss counts, the official numbers consistently lag, and sometimes contradict what our users say is happening in the New York bank job market - but then again, our users are job hunters.

A look at the N.Y. Labor Department's data for the prior year, running from April 2008 to April 2009, shows a total of 31,700 jobs lost in the financial activities sector, with 21,200 of those losses centered in securities, commodity contracts, and related activities.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports 66,900 jobs were lost nationally during the same period from the financial activities sector, including securities, commodity contracts, and investments.

Comments (3)

View all comments

Bookmark

  • Blinklist.com
  • Reddit.com
  • Digg.com
  • Furl.com
  • Google.com
  • Del.icio.us
  • Yahoo.com
  • Netscape.com
  • Stumbleupon.com

Comments (3)

  • I agree with you.  Relatively speaking there was a brief period, three, four months, where banks were panicking and nobody was looking to hire, only to retrench and cut positions.  But I believe this period has passed, and now financial corporations are out there looking to hire.  I must admit it was gradual, but my feeling right now is that soon the industry will be chasing less and less available talent.

    ritaep 14 Aug 2009

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • The boutique and other hiring I've seen are either in compliance (more overhead, and non-productive) or simply going after more sales i.e  hiring books and fees which is tatamount to a big churn.

    Frankzak 02 Nov 2009

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • I was a compliance officer and they laid me off. The owners in order to save money are doing it themselves-"cheap is expensive". The reason is their sales reps are either lazy, complacent or incompetent to generate enough business to pay for a compliance officer. Compliance officers are necessary, but firms are taking a different route as I mentioned above.

    vence2001 14 Nov 2009

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

Add your comment

* Mandatory

You have 1200 characters left

Enter the code shown here or sign in / register to skip this step. (What is this?)

Post comment

Jobs

Col3
Col4
Col5
Col6
bottom

Site Information

eFinancialCareers is a Dice Holdings, Inc. company. Dice Holdings, Inc. is a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange (Ticker: DHX)