Job News & Views

Search

Post Your Resume

Back

Print

Bonus Damage: It's Not Just Fixed-Income

Dec 18 2007

Anonymous

As one of Wall Street's primary casualties of the sub-prime meltdown, Merrill Lynch is being spotlighted as an early read on the breadth and depth of damage to year-end bonuses.

While recent media reports of a 40 percent average year-over-year bonus reduction for fixed-income are no surprise, one news outlet says that Merrill's investment bankers, equity traders and even private bankers will be paid less than last year on average. The last area in particular is one where major banks continue to rev up investment, as clients, assets and profits continue to swell without entangling banks' capital in risky financial assets.

"In the investment banking and equities areas, bonuses will be flat to 10 percent lower, while private client support will be down 5 to 10 percent," CNBC's Charlie Gasparino reported Friday. John Thain, Merrill's new chief executive, wants all departments to share the pain, according to CNBC. "Sources say the move has drawn deep resentment in the company, possibly leading to lawsuits," the network added.

Merrill employees will officially learn their bonus amounts early in the New Year, according to Bloomberg News. The figures making the rounds this week were derived from bonus pool totals reportedly sent to Merrill managers for divvying up among team members.

If True, Will It Backfire?

Recruiters interviewed by eFC offered mixed opinions about the likelihood and the wisdom of management – at Merrill or anywhere – opting to cut most employees' bonuses below year-earlier levels within profitable business units that they expect to keep growing for both the near-term and the long-term.

"I don't think banks want to hurt the performing areas of their business," says Steve Yendell, managing consultant at Selby Jennings in London. Even allowing for inevitable reshuffling of profits to support bonuses for selected individuals in loss-making departments, Yendell still expects most employees in strongly performing departments to get bigger payouts than last year - just not as big as they would have been if the credit crisis hadn't occurred. "Instead of 10 (percent) up, they might be 5 up," he says.

Jay Gaines, chief executive of New York search firm Jay Gaines & Co. takes an opposite view, shaped in part by his conviction that Wall Street's long-dominant "get it while you can" compensation model needs to be torn out at the roots.

"It would be a travesty if parts of Merrill paid their people well while the firm took these enormous losses," Gaines told eFC. Instead, he looks for Wall Street's new leaders, such as Thain and Citigroup's Vikram Pandit, to overhaul compensation formulas, "so that people aren't encouraged to take their firm over the cliff."

When asked whether even a financially troubled institution can afford to alienate its own investment banking or private wealth management teams, Gaines opines that most employees who generate "consistent dollars and are part of the fabric of the firm" understand the broad impact of the credit crunch, and consequently will accept a reduced bonus without bolting.

"These people make a lot of money. And no one said it's all good years," Gaines says. Naming four bulge-bracket shops that have yet to release fourth-quarter results, he says, "These earnings are going to be off considerably from previous years, and it's got to affect how anybody gets compensated." He also says Wall Street's most "mercenary" employees will eventually jump to hedge funds even if banks pay up to hold onto them now.

Yendell of Selby Jennings agrees it shouldn't be assumed that every bank employee whose payout is smaller than 2006 will try to bolt, or will succeed.

Unofficial Bonus Decomposition

Expanding on CNBC's story, Bloomberg News reported that Merrill "told fixed-income managers to cut 2007 bonuses by an average of 40 percent, according to two people briefed on the matter. Payments may fall by as much as 80 percent for traders who specialize in the mortgage bonds and collateralized debt obligations that posted the steepest losses." Interest-rate traders may see their bonuses decline 20 percent on average, while corporate bond traders may be paid 60 percent less than 2006, Bloomberg said, citing unnamed sources inside Merrill.

But Bloomberg did not repeat CNBC's assertion of bonus reductions for Merrill Lynch investment bankers, equity traders and private bankers. Bloomberg's story did say that "Even stock traders and investment bankers who generated profit gains this year may get little or no bonus increases," and that the payouts may contain a higher proportion of stock this year.

Comments (10)

  • wrong tactic, you want performers to leave, than cut their bonuses - surely some other firm (ahham goldman) will pick them up. good luck in '08 merrill - buying those put options - how low can we go....

    Anonymous 18 Dec 2007

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • Bear says top managers will forgoe bonuses-do we see a pattern developing?

    Anonymous 19 Dec 2007

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • its about time wall streeters..no more disconnect from middel america...time for a return to normalicy in terms of pay...200K total compensation should be the max pay for senior bankers..

    Anonymous 19 Dec 2007

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • Who'd want anyone from Merrill anyway (well maybe their IB bankers in financials) the rest are stuck in the 80s

    Anonymous 19 Dec 2007

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • Funny, Marcel Rohner at UBS hasn't offered up his bonus for 2007, just hundreds of innocent bystander's jobs.  The truth is that you used to be able predict your bonus outcome fairly well if you and/or your immediate department performed.  Not so, now.  Wharton flunkies blowing holes in the P&L with structured timebombs by way of junk CDO's...they got paid.  In situations like this the upper tiers should take most of the pain just as they take most of the cash and credit during the good times.  At UBS, Zurich got queasy and fired a whole bunch of high performing people...but I got no sense any of the "risk managers" bought it.  What drugs were they on while the structured finance jerks were going long and longer to the tune of $BB while the U.S. housing market was publicly tanking? Totally reflexive and unfairly distributed.  The whole of any firm or division should not feel the pain because of the colossal mistakes of a few greedy souls.

    anonymous 19 Dec 2007

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • Anyone still working at an investment bank needs to seriously reflect on their life choices.  Banks are left with the chaff of the industry.  How many hedge funds blew up because of the "credit crisis"?  I dare you to name one.  This is only a crisis for those who are wasting their lives at i-banks.

    Anonymous 20 Dec 2007

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • Dopey in compliance , Marcel Rohner boss , Marcel Ospel , has said he doesn't expect or want a bonus. That said the risk managers at UBS suck and from the looks of it their compliance/legal aren'tr much better.

    Anonymous 20 Dec 2007

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • actually, Sowood blew up b/k of the credit crunch.  hedge funds do not by any stretch of the imagination have smarter people.  Amaranth, LTCM, Bear Stearns' hedge funds, etc...

    anon 21 Dec 2007

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • Accepting what you can't change is a key to happiness.  The sun rises in the east and most management teams on the Street will use a weak year as an excuse to nickel & dime high-performance employees.  Duh.  Take a deep breath, enjoy your holidays with your friends & family (if you have any left), and then analyze your best path forward.  Getting upset obscures thinking and is bad for your karma.  F*** Wall Street, my gorgeous wife still loves me and my 2007-vintage boy is the cutest baby in my zip code.

    Anonymous 21 Dec 2007

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • Who said $200k should be max comp for any banker? You can't raise a dog for $200k in the NY area, much less a family. If the employees create profits they should share the profit.

    observer 05 Jan 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

Add your comment

* Mandatory

You have 1200 characters left

Enter the code shown here or sign in / register to skip this step. (What is this?)

Post comment

Jobs

Col3
Col4
Col5
Col6
bottom

Site Information

eFinancialCareers is a Dice Holdings, Inc. company. Dice Holdings, Inc. is a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange (Ticker: DHX)