Bank jobs, finance jobs, recruitment in the financial markets, accounting and investment banking. Find jobs, post resumes and browse job market news

Job News & Views

Search

Post Your Resume

 

Print

CFA or MBA: Which is right for you?

Apr 18, 2007

Emma Johnson

A lot of people are wondering whether they should seek a CFA in place of the more traditional MBA. In large part, the answer depends on your focus.

The Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation has been enjoying a heightened profile and increased popularity in light of surging private equity activity. So far In 2007 - the program's 44th year - 140,000 people from 156 countries have registered to sit for the three exams that determine, in part, whether one is permitted to tag those three letters at the end of their signature.

A lot of people are wondering whether they should seek a CFA in place of the more traditional MBA. Which will get them ahead? Which will make them more marketable? Which will attract a bigger compensation package?

Whether you should seek a CFA, an MBA, or both has everything to do you’re your professional goals, says Joshua Wimberley, a client partner in recruiter Korn/Ferry's financial officers practice. Simply put, if your goals include anything but asset management, a CFA isn't for you.

Focus on Asset Management

"The CFA is of huge importance in the asset management industry," Wimberley explains. "An MBA is more for investment banking or business in general. It's the standard educational background on Wall Street. If you want to go into investment banking, there is no need for a CFA. It's really comparing apples and oranges."

In short, the CFA gives you the technical skills to succeed in investment management, while an MBA prepares you for a broad range of challenges in the business world. Even for those dedicated to investment management, the big-picture business know-how an MBA affords can propel your career and earnings.

Even executives with the CFA Institute encourage an MBA for those seeking their designation. Bob Johnson, managing director of the CFAI's education division, says the MBA and CFA are "complimentary, not competitive" designations. "I do realize people have a limited amount of time and need to prioritize what educational opportunities they avail themselves of," says Johnson. "For a young person who is preparing for a career in investment management, both educational opportunities are something they should consider."

'The Ideal Career Path'

Johnson lays out what he considers an ideal career path for a recent college grad committed to asset management: Enter the CFA program while working full-time. With the work experience and the CFA designation, enter a MBA program - also while working. "Think about it," he says. "You are 28, 29 years old with both a CFA and an MBA and six years of work experience." In addition, he notes, "most employers in the investment management business will subsidize the cost of a CFA program and an MBA."

Meanwhile, Korn/Ferry's Wimberley believes a junior-level asset management professional with a CFA alone should succeed. "If you're talented and a high performer and all you want to do is asset management, I would say get an CFA," he says, adding that the treasurers of many Fortune 1,000 companies, CFOs and controllers have Level 3 CFAs only.

To those who suggest the CFA is replacing the MBA, Dave Wilson, president and CEO of the Graduate Management Admission Council, says: "Not a chance." The CFA charter produces "first-class analysts," he says, but an MBA covers the fundamentals of business relevant to every type of organization, from entrepreneurial start-ups, to multinational corporations, not-for-profits, and government agencies. "An MBA prepares someone to work within an organization as it relates to margins, strategy, mission, marketing and human resource issues," he says. "That will always make the MBA a relevant degree."

The Costs

When it comes to the nitty-gritty, there are big differences in each designation. For one thing, the price difference is significant: CFA enrollment and exam fees are $2,200, compared to the more than $100,000 an MBA from a top school can cost. It takes a minimum of three years of coursework - at least 250 hours of self-guided study - before one can sit for the six-hour CFA exam. A typical MBA program, attended full-time, takes two years.

The CFAI limits the number of charters they grant yearly - in 2005 and 2006, 5,752 and 10,045 charters were awarded, respectively. (In 2005, 80,000 people sat for the CFA. In 2006, 91,000 people sat.) Today, the institute has nearly 78,000 members worldwide, with the numbers of registered applicants ballooning in India, China and Hong Kong.

Comments (211)

"Its quite clear that an MBA from a top institution adds value. But having paid a heck of a lot of money for mine at HBS I can't be sure what it added to career progress. Yes it was good for networking and some basic business knowledge but that's about it."

View all comments

Bookmark

  • Blinklist.com
  • Reddit.com
  • Digg.com
  • Furl.com
  • Google.com
  • Del.icio.us
  • Yahoo.com
  • Netscape.com
  • Stumbleupon.com

Comments (211)

  • this article is misleading. The CFA is comprised of three exams, not one, and a typical candidate will fail at least one of the three before completing the process.

    paul 18 Apr 2007

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • I did reword to clarify, but we didn't mean to imply this is an easy designation to get.

    Mark Feffer 18 Apr 2007

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • As a holder of both I can unequivically say that the CFA is far more comprehensive/difficult and relevant than an MBA. Not sure I understand how the CFA is less relevant to investment banking; don't both analysts and investment bankers claim to be arbiters of value? Does corp. fin 101 prepare one for i-banking? Surely you can't be arguing that hashing out a few case studies somehow gives a ubiquitious MBAer greater insight into determining strategic direction of a co. or the appropriate discount rate for a DCF? If that is the argument, might I suggest VALUATION website and subscribing to the HBR. A savings of just $99,800.



    The article should be really be about the dicotomy between the value proposition of an MBA and what amounts to a low ROI (intangiblly speaking).  CFA teaches you hard skills and tests you on them. MBA teaches you soft skills. That does make them complimentary. Yet, make no mistake, the CFA prepares you for any capital markets challenge. An MBA does not. MBAs are about networks, rear view debating and getting past the gatekeeper. For reasons unknown, MBA still garner pull from the majors, despite the degree's inherent and growing irrelevance

    Yawn..... 18 Apr 2007

    RECOMMEND Recommended 1 time | Alert Moderator

  • Can you elaborate on the statment that the "CFA limits the numbers of charters annually"? I thought those passing Level III with the required work experience and recommendations were awarded the charter?  What do you mean by limits?  What are the limits?

    John 19 Apr 2007

    RECOMMEND Recommended 1 time | Alert Moderator

  • As a novice in the field of IB, I have a question.  I currently teach 5 grade math/sci. and will be graduating with an MBA from a mid B school this summer.  Considering the fact that I have no experience in corporate finance (only 13 years in travel and 2 in education), would you advise me to go after a CFA if my goal is to enter the risk job market or should I pursue an emphasis in stats?

    windell 19 Apr 2007

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • The distinction between CFA as a professional degree and MBA as a University degree has to be made.


    There are way too many variable aside from the 2 degrees mentioned that will put you on the right career path or give you a bigger salary or faster promotion.


    As a holder of both for the past 1.5 year and a half of my career I have not been able to penetrate the asset management industry even with the 2 degrees. I’m still sit stuck in middle office in an I-Bank. There are way too many other variables that come into the picture aside from the CFA and a MBA. I would put a disclosure that the story described above applies only for any new graduate coming out of the top 10 undergrad Universities or the Ivy MBA programs.

    ab 19 Apr 2007

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • For a person in IT trying to make a move to asset management, is CFA better or an MBA? Is either of the two a golden ticket that gets your foot in the door? I have passed level I of the CFA and am writing level II in June this year. If I can't make a career switch by the end of this year, I'll consider an MBA.



    Any comments will be much appreciated.

    Yello 19 Apr 2007

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • I run a L/S equity hedge fund in CT and I too am a CFA Charter Holder and a possess an MBA. Let me be the first one to say that CFA is over rated. It used to be something that I was proud to have gone through and obtain. But recently as the article has stated, the number of CFA candidates that have registered to sit for the exams and the quality of the candidates says something about the program. I feel the CFA Institute is accepting anyone and everyone who wants to pony up the registration fee. One great example is my child's violin teacher who is siting for the level 2 exam this June. Violin teacher? She has ZERO financial industry experience. When I sat for the exams, I needed 3 recommendations from CFA charter holders and at least 3 years of financial industry experience before I was allowed to sit for the exam. Now I have my settlements and back office personnel at my work sitting for CFA designations. What possible use can they have for the CFA settling my trades? To be honest, after June, they will need to start looking for new job. I feel the CFA designation is not as important as it used to be ever since the CFA Institute eased the requirements to sit for the exam.

    Anonymous 19 Apr 2007

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • The CFA designation is relevant not solely for asset management, but is also for sell-side research positions.  It is mandatory for most senior analysts in equity research departments, and fixed-income research is moving in that direction as well.  (I agree that the CFA is of no great value for other departments within Wall Street, such as investment banking.)

    Jon Jacobs 19 Apr 2007

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • It is interesting to hear that the CFA lacks it's importance of antiquity because the CFA Institute has eased the requirements to sit for the exam.  This designation indicates that the Charterholder has completed three exams, has the requisite work experience, and has met the CFAI's other requirements.  It demonstrates that the holder has a certain level of education, that's it!  While it is rather dismaying to hear this relic claim (much like my child when he touts that he discovered a new fashion before it was "cool") that the CFA charter no longer has importance because of the entrance requirements, it is heartening to know if this dinosaur who probably couldn't even spell doctorate can manage a fund, there is hope for the incoming candidates.

    Violin Teacher 19 Apr 2007

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

Add your comment

* Mandatory

You have 1200 characters left

Enter the code shown here or sign in / register to skip this step. (What is this?)

Post comment

Jobs

Col3
Col4
Col5
Col6
bottom

Site Information

eFinancialCareers is a Dice Holdings, Inc. company. Dice Holdings, Inc. is a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange (Ticker: DHX)