Political correctness is getting to the stage where it’s harming the careers of minorities in the City and elsewhere, says David Charters.
Q: When is a joke not a joke?
A: When it can cause offence (real or imagined) and justify a six-figure claim for compensation.
We live in a strange world. It is a world where investment banks send teams away for expensive bonding weekends and encourage them to take part in activities that break down barriers and create a team spirit, yet in the next breath impose restrictions on all forms of interpersonal conduct to protect themselves from the legal fallout of anyone ever causing any kind of offence to anyone else.
If it sounds like self-contradictory madness, welcome to the City of London in the 21st century. I’m old enough (just) to remember the pre-Big Bang days before it was possible to circulate email jokes (we didn’t have email then), when drinking at lunchtimes was still permitted, at least on Fridays, relationships in the office were not unusual, everyone thought PC stood for Police Constable, and the customary arbiter of what constituted appropriate behaviour between colleagues could be summed up as the ‘three Cs’ – courtesy, compassion and common sense.
It’s true that there were incidents then when people overstepped the mark – one drink too many at the Christmas Party led to a few careers hitting major roadblocks – but much of the time we got by without feeling the need for employment lawyers or diversity consultants.
Today things are different. Mailsweeper programmes monitor our emails for profanity (swear words to you and me), compulsory diversity training is accepted without a murmur by people who are otherwise confident and robust enough not to be patronised in their working lives, and sanitised humour and officially orchestrated fun are the order of the day.
The question is does it actually help anyone? Clearly the people who make their living by exploiting the climate of the times – not least the lawyers – are prospering.
But at the margin has it improved opportunities for women and minorities to reach the top of their profession? In my view not. Competition does that. The City needs to access the biggest, broadest talent pool it can, not to be politically correct, but to be successful.
At the margin, it probably adds an additional, unspoken burden to women and minorities applying for high pressure roles in environments where people don’t necessarily behave at their best when the stress gets too great. If two candidates are equally talented and experienced, and one comes without potential legal baggage, there’s always a reason to go for the easy option. So it probably means the minority candidates have to be even better to succeed, and the ‘help and support’ of the additional protections offered to them have backfired.
The genie is out of the bottle, and we won’t turn the clock back. But maybe we should insist in future that all diversity training starts with the three Cs – if we can get that bit right, perhaps the rest won’t be needed.
David Charters’ latest book, The Ego Has Landed, is published by Elliott and Thompson, price 9.99.
UK

This assumes most people are mature responsible people who respect their colleagues. In my experience, I’ve met so many bigoted and racist colleagues at work who had regular tirades about people who weren’t straight white men and Im very grateful that diversity training and policies have helped people feel more comfortable and aware that they can complain about these.
I agree with David. The very real downside of political correctness is that one mistrusts one’s colleagues and at times it distracts from the real business. Diversity training in my experience is more a thinly veiled threat and best suffered in silence. Attend, say nothing to challenge the party line, get the tick in the box and forget it. I take exception that some “consultant” can come to my workplace and tell me how to behave morally. The main problem with PC is that the sands are constantly shifting and no one can ever be sure how to behave “appropriately” as it comes down to individuals, so it is best to shut up and keep any comment outside of the immediate work task to oneself. Everyone has a protective barrier up now. I certainly have stopped socialising with work colleagues, it is just too dangerous. Better to be known as the party pooper than to end up sued and lose your job over an innocent comment. Why should our employers become both Police and moral guardian ? George Orwell must feel vindicated.
This PC stuff is a pain… People are scared to even discuss religion. Why shouldn’t I ask questions of my co-workers – religion is fascinating… Otherwise, you just end up socially segregating a workforce, which is pathetic…
Diversity training is all very well, but if you have a real problem with racism, sexism etc at work, you’re not going to get any more support from HR than if it were a case of bullying (without the discrimination elements). Having legal rights is one thing, but getting a bank to enforce them is a totally different proposition. Good luck with that!
I’m with Sandia on this one. Banks love generating rules, then quietly ignore them whenever those rules get a bit inconvenient. I’d agree that anti-discriminatory laws are too much a blunt instrument, but sometimes, the thicko racist, sexist Neanderthals don’t understand anything else…and I hear there’s a fair old few of them in finance.
Diversity isn’t about not letting people discuss race/religion/etc but stopping people persecuting somebody because of these. As it seems that some of us smart bankers really can’t tell the difference (such as my lovely colleague spouting some racist comment the other day) then thank god we have diversity training to teach them about it!
Political correctness–the dictatorship of virtue–is a form of fascism.
I agree with Sandia. Some years ago I worked at one of the more traditional M&A firms, with a connection to a rather well known family. A secretary complained that she had been sexually harassed by the chairman and HR did everything they could to dissuade her from taking it any further, rather than actually deal with the complaint. it simply didnt matter to them. You wont get support and you sill be seen as a “silly little complainer” if you say anything. Rules or no rules. As for the 3C’s – come off it! Various female collegeagues of mine had to beat the men off with sticks – my boss even told colleagues he’d like to see me on page 3. Common sense and courtesy – if only!
I have a policy when it comes to this kind of stuff…
Diversity training also starts from the erroneous stand-point that minorities can’t be racist, that women can’t me sexist and that homosexuals can’t make disparaging comments about others. So what it basically is, is being told that being a big, bad white man means that you are inherently evil, similar to the old extremist feminist mantra that every man is a potential rapist…
This article and many of the comments really shows how antiquated and behind this country and how porly managed it is at so many levels. It appears like the locals think that the T5 debacle has caused tainted the view of UK/London/BA – but no – we already know how behind everything is here and expected it. This article and many of the comments is off course just part of the same pattern. Wake up, we are in the 21st century now! (not the 19th)
i never faced racism in the city and this is after 15 years of work, but yes, i did face in your face racism in saudi arabia and sweden, go figure.
Two points:
(1) Legislation does not change people’s inner thoughts – it merely trys to stop a person acting on them in a negative way. The only way to end discrimination is through education because people fear the unknown. Employers should have a different cultural themed seminar each month. Any sensible employer should know that a talented employee should be on board, regardless of what culture they are from or what they do in their private life.
(2) The judiciary are largely to blame for the state of the law today. Remember that legislation tends to be very vague, and it is the judges who decide how to interpret it. It was also the judiciary that created the absurd tortious litigation culture that exists today, by finding that all sorts of people owed duties of care to others, enabling compensation claims.
Fundamentally, maliciousness should be punished but everyone should become a little more thick-skinned about things.
Golly… !!