The Jerôme Kerviel fraud case at Sociéte Générale exposed the bank’s inadequate internal reporting tools, so not surprisingly it’s been placing them under review since the incident in 2008. Now, it’s completed a massive overhaul of its business intelligence software, an area other banks are likely to invest more in going forward.
SocGen has invested in a new BI Platform from specialist vendor Microstrategy, which provides consistent business data and a common view for all users in divisions such as sales, financial, marketing and risk analysis. This will affect 20,000 users.
Business intelligence technology is a growth area, suggests Jeff Goldberg, senior analyst at IT consultancy Celent.
“During economic difficulty business intelligence is critical for increasing efficiency, decreasing losses, and preparing for the increased regulations many fear may require more tracking and insight into their data,” he says.
Jean-Louis Tribut, manager of the decision support division of Sociéte Générale, said taking a third-party solution addressed, among other things, the firm’s “global cost requirements”.
And with purse strings tight, most banks will probably take the cheaper vendor route rather than build in-house. Does this mean job creation is unlikely?
Rejeena Bra, banking consultant at technology think Pierre Audoin Consultants, believes BI software is a good place to work at the moment.
“There will be new roles within the vendors, which are likely to see an increase in the business and some opportunities within the banks themselves,” she says. “Because of the legacy systems banks have in place, they’ll need some sort of customisation, and they’ll employ a small IT team for this bespoke work.”
UK

BI is an emerging competitive necessity and something most organisations are still floundering with. Deep visibility of costs and operational trends based on a “single version of the truth” will become a characteristic of the organisations that lead out of this downturn. Gone are the days of multi-level bespoke reports, produced by legions of highly paid middlemen grafting away on their own excel reports – look for the organisations that have a BICC ( Business Intelligence Competency Centre) and you have an agile forward thinking winner.
A business intelligence (BI) solution should be used only for the advanced analysis of data. However, many departments within banks are using various capabilities of the BI stack to consolidate disparate sources of data. And it is herein that lies the problem. Different departments will create their own databases, in which they will maintain their own perspectives of business data. The result is a complete mess. Each department will produce a different answer to the same question. If some data is changed in a system that is mainated by department A, these changes are likely to only be realised by departments X and Y some years later.
The key to competitive advantage in BI is to consolidate the management of data from the outset, and NOT after development. Examine the IT departments of any large company and you will see thousands of people employed to produce reports based on data from different sources. Furthermore, these people will spend 80% of their time fixing data consistenty errors. It is ridiculous. Personally, I find it quite funny: people are being made redundant and yet there are hundreds of “IT” contractors being paid 500 pounds per day to produce “reports”.
BI and indeed Information Governance IT are two areas I have seen significant change in across the financial market and investment community.
It is worth mentioning that in both the Enron fraud case and the case involving the now infamous Jerôme Kerviel and Soc Gen – it wasn’t clever Risk Managers or even Fraud/compliance Officers who managed to untangle the merky mess…it was actually thanks to the ingenious technology employed after the initial suspicions were raised.
This leads on to the debate of reactive or proactive risk management?
In both cases mentioned earlier it was the clever technology employed by Autonomy (AU) which provided the solutions to the intricate fraud committed. Since then, the investment community has been slowly realizing the need to manage not only their structured information assets but also their unstructured information assets – this includes IM, Phone calls, Emails and even Video evidence to any authority imposing litigation on the bank/fund.
I for one welcome this change and already in my fund i can rest a little easier knowing my pesky traders are playing ball. (nicely)