A new report by Citigroup analyst Wes Nason says if Macquarie made 1,000 redundancies, about 6.4 per cent of its workforce, it would help to boost the firm’s share price and annual returns.
“While it has not been Macquarie’s historic path, in order to sustain competitive remuneration and help restore returns to industry standards, some selective reduction of staff, say 1000, probably needs to occur,” says the report.
It not certain whether Macquarie is even considering layoffs on anything like this scale. However, reducing headcount could in theory leave it with a larger bonus pool for remaining employees, which could help stem the flow of bankers who have recently left the firm in Australia and Asia.
Bonus blues
Macquarie has restructured its bonuses so they increasingly involve deferred compensation and non-cash payments, making it more like a European bank and giving its US rivals a potential advantage in the competitive Asia Pacific talent market. Its employee profit-sharing plan pays more as its earnings rise, but while markets stay subdued, bankers may feel unrewarded.
“It’s true that people have left because they aren’t happy with how their bonus has been put together. But this is by no means a mass exodus. Many of the staff are staying put – the people who are Macquarie through and through,” says a Sydney headhunter, who asked not to be named.
In its notice for its annual general meeting in June, Macquarie admitted to facing remuneration and retention challenges. And in April, chief executive Nicholas Moore said at the bank’s full-year profit result that competition to keep staff was intense, confirming that people had been lost after being tempted by lucrative packages from rivals in Asia.
Deals in decline
Macquarie’s shares have declined 17 per cent since June 1, on the back of decreased earnings from its investment banking and trading business. In Australia, Macquarie is normally a top-three player in M&A, having clinched a spot for the past six years. This year it doesn’t rank in the leading 10. Although it stands at third in Australian equity underwriting, market volumes are currently low.
In Asia excluding Japan and Australia, the firm is rated 49th by core investment-banking revenue for the first half of 2011, according to Dealogic, down 15 places from 2010. “It’s not doing as many deals and its bonuses aren’t as compelling. Add this all up, and some – but certainly not all – employees might think ‘what is making me stay here?’,” adds the headhunter.
Another Sydney recruiter says the “intangible quality of its brand”, which was Macquarie’s siren call to attract aspiring millionaire bankers, is in decline. “This means loyalty is waning too. It’s now seen as just another bank, all be it still a good bank.”
Macquarie is trying to counter some of its compensation problems by proposing higher base salaries for staff in risk management or key finance roles, as well as bonus claw-backs for those who underperform or leave. Shareholders will consider these changes at the bank’s annual meeting on July 28.
A reduced staff bonus pool and share price are among the factors which also make Macquarie a potential target for a friendly takeover bid, according to CLSA analyst Brian Johnson.
US

Perfect logic in the last paragraph. Should we assume that whenever a bank reduces bonuses and its shares fall it is potential acquisition target? May I suggest that HR people focus on HR issues and not make random inferences derived from rumours.
Isn’t Wes a nice chap? Strong evidence for the prosecution in the case of People Vs Bankers …
IBist, isn’t the last para taken from a CLSA analyst report? where’s the HR connection. I don’t see any HR people quoted in the entire article
Well, my bad – it was quite incompetent and unjustified comment from CLSA analyst, which is even more regrettable (for CLSA as well I guess…). Please read it carefully (do not repeat my mistakes), there are two quotes from HR: “says a Sydney headhunter, who asked not to be named”, “Another Sydney recruiter says”.
IBist, you might want to not make random inferences yourself. You obvously work in the banking sector, so you would be wise to know who Brian Johnson is.
There are two agency headhunters quoted….but no HR people (HR work in-house at banks).
The only reason Mac Bank is suffering and the share price falling is because I recently invested in it.
Am thinking of buying an apartment soon, lets see what happens to the property market then…
@confused – I cannot tell the difference between internal and external HR (Human Resources) specialists. From my experience they are of the same breed :) Many if not all “external” recruiters are former “internal” HRs with the banks/firms they are hiring for.
@invest – I’d stay as far away from banking stocks as possible… And Macquarie would be the first on my no-go list, but property is perhaps just as bad :(
@IBist, internal HR at rival banks wouldn’t know as much about what’s happening at Mac this year…whereas agency recruiters would currently be hiring from or for Mac.
What all the comments miss is the leveraged Mac Bank business model is toast – throw the senior mgmt under the bus not the workers – not much behind the Hermes ties apart from a lot of wind