With the bulge bracket investment banks again on the hunt for technology talent, those lower down the food chain – whether that’s tier two investment banks or consultancies – are struggling to hold on to IT staff.
As we’ve pointed to previously, some of the larger investment banks – such as Morgan Stanley, Citi and Credit Suisse – have been aggressively growing their technology headcount across a range of asset classes as new projects get the thumbs up.
The result is that they’re tapping talent within smaller organisations.
“We are continuing to see candidates moving from tier two investment banks and traditional consultancies move back to tier one banks. This has hit tier two banks hard, especially those that struggled throughout 2009,” says Darrell Cameron-Webb, head of investment banking at IT in finance recruiters the JM Group.
The traditional reasons for making this move were that the larger organisations generally paid more, and there’s greater scope for career advancement once you get your feet under the table.
But the smaller banks are hitting back, says Cameron-Webb: “They are using fairly heavy packages to try and compensate for working in what is likely to be an uncertain, an even more stressful climate.”
“Generally, technologists working in big five consultancies will jump at the chance to move to a bulge bracket investment bank,” adds Bradley Wood, partner at capital markets consultancy GreySpark Partners.
“It affords the opportunity to move from a generic financial services practice to an investment banking environment that many will find attractive. Investment banks are also no longer prepared to pay big five consulting rates, so it’s no surprise that consultants from these firms are considering their alternatives.”
So, what are the reasons for staying with a consultancy? Wood says that the range of experience gained working within a consultancy – across a range of projects within multiple organisations – means your experience is boosted considerably quicker over the years.
“Essentially, working for a consultancy, especially a specialist one, combines the variety of being a contractor with the opportunity for career development while avoiding the obvious job security risks” he says. “What’s more, you’re in a revenue generating role – rather than a cost-centre, as you would be in a bank – which means compensation is based around the profits you bring in. In essence, for the best, it’s the bonus scheme that until recently you would have expected from an investment bank.”
UK

What are the Big Five consultancies? Accenture, Capgemini, IBM?
LogicaCMG and EDS (now HP Enterprise Services)?
Wood said “working for a consultancy…..avoiding the obvious job security risks”.. I disagree with this statement as during the recession, these small consultancies were the first one to be affected as they litterly can’t afford the people on bench… and moreover they don’t get more contracts – hence forces the consultants to leave…
The Big 5 are: Cap Genini, Accenture, KPMG, IBM, PWC and possibly McKinsey/BCG as well.
When I state “avoiding the obvious job security risks” I am really talking in comparison to being contractor. A consultant is a permanent, salaried employee — and that is inherently more secure than a contractor role (although, as we all know, no job is 100% secure).
Interestingly, when the recession hit, at GreySpark, we found that opportunities for specialist (i.e., Capital Markets only) firms like ours actually increased, rather than decreased. When Lehman’s died and BarCap and Nomura started picking at the carcass they both needed some serious consulting help in integrating their acquisitions. This is big business for consulting businesses that know what they’re doing.
Add to that a shifting regulatory landscape, a need to revisit all risk management practices, systems, and processes in light of the crunch and you can very easily see how much change needs to happen in most investment banks.
For consultants, client change means more business.
Totally agree with Bradley on this one. If you think about any market place at the moment the shrink caused by the recession is probably on average 10% in total available business for consultancy businesses, the trick of course is being well placed to fill the 90% still available. Not discounting that, recession ultimately means change for all organisations and therefore a greater need for the consultant, individual or firm to be prepared to make the change themselves and have the ability to ‘sell’ that need for their services even more so than when selling to them was relatively easy. As a consultancy employee as opposed to being just a contractor your ability to ‘sell’ the package is increased as is your ability to strengthen your commercial skills. As a contractor the lack of exposure to knowledge and skills gained from other colleagues, the pressure on time and swimming alone reduces fees and your employability.