Robert Pryor and Jim Bright, researchers based at the School of Education, Australian Catholic University published a fascinating paper entitled ‘Applying Chaos Theory to Careers’ in the prestigious academic journal The Journal of Vocational Behaviour. This is a journal specializing in publishing rigorous academic research into all aspects of careers and work life.
Chaos Theory is based on assumptions about the world which are kind of obvious when you think about them, but are frequently neglected in our attempts to make sense to what is happening to us. These Australian authors argue that an understanding of Chaos Theory might be particularly helpful when dealing with a career crisis like unemployment.
Chaos Theory asserts that the world around us is both complex and interconnected. For example, who would have thought that the inability of an unemployed American in New Orleans to pay their mortgage could lead to hundreds workers in a van manufacturer (LDV) being laid off thousands of miles away in the UK?
Complexity and interconnectedness
The credit crunch is a harsh and brutal reminder of the twin pillars on which chaos theory rests – complexity combined with interconnectedness. It follows on from these basic foundations that small apparently innocuous changes can eventually produce catastrophic or enormous outcomes. This is referred to by mathematicians as a ‘non-linear’ characteristic of a system.
What this means is that the end result can be massive and not expected froma small change at the beginning.
The famous example in Chaos Theory is the argument that a butterfly fluttering its wings in one part of the world could lead to a hurricane in another.
Pryor and Bright argue that the weather is a good example of a system that is neither truly chaotic and random or entirely ordered and predictable, but that it lies in-between. It is what is termed mathematically; on the Edge of Chaos. This is referred to ‘in the trade’ as ‘EOS’.
The job market and your career is also believe it or not more EOS, or On the Edge of Chaos, than indeed entirely predictable or random. The trouble is our brains tend to either try hard to see pattern in the chaos. We erroneously assume it’s much more ordered and predictable than it really is. Alternatively, we do the opposite and assume its much more random than genuinely reflects reality.
So if we lose a job because of events remote to our performance, as will be common in this recession, this knock-back with its massive emotional fallout means we can easily become disheartened and can easily fall into the trap of deciding that given it’s all random anyway why bother making an effort to get our careers back on track?
Conversely, those who tend to believe they have much more control over their destiny than they really do, in this predicament, are likely to overly castigate themselves for their perceived failure. They will take too much personal responsibility for their predicament, and this could lead to depression and disillusionment. They will wrestle with the problem that if they took the credit for their career success before, what alternative is there but to beat themselves up for the current tragedy?
Become an open system thinker
Pryor and Bright argue the best psychological approach to thinking about your career, perhaps particularly in the face of a setback like job loss, is to adopt a particular style of thinking and perception borrowed from mathematics around Chaos Theory.
They contest that there are two kinds of thinkers: open system thinkers, and closed system thinkers.
Those who think in closed system terms tend to seek to gain almost total control over the functioning of the system. This is driven by an expectation that their careers, the job market and the work place all function in ways that are predictable and stable. They are generally pretty successful people because of their perfectionism,
Open systems thinking accepts the unexpected can and sometimes will happen. As a result we are frequently vulnerable to change over which we have no control. While we desire life to be fair, open systems thinking recognizes life came with no guarantees inside the box.
While we should indeed endeavor to control as much as we can around us, it’s also vital to grasp (according to open systems thinking) our limitations. Just because we may have experienced order, pattern and stability previously in a successful career, the reality of major transformation in our lives is forever present, according to Chaos Theory. It follows, then, the past does not guarantee the present, nor the present the future.
Since a small difference may result in very (non-linear) major reconfiguration of the system, it follows the unplanned and the unexpected are not simply exceptions to the stability and order we experienced before, but are in fact part of its very nature.
Once this is accepted, Pryor and Bright conclude, instead of being seen as a perpetual threat to be warded off, change can be seen instead as a reality to be created and influenced at best and accepted and submitted to, at worst.
Dr Raj Persaud is a Consultant Psychiatrist working in the NHS and in Private Practice and is author of many best-selling books including editing The Mind A Users Guide published by Bantam Press with The Royal College of Psychiatrists.
SG

Very interesting article. I have never thought about the applicability of Chaos Theory to the job market, and to one’s career! More intellectually stimulating articles like this please.
Raj, can you get of those open systems that you talk of, and lock yourself in, so that it is a closed system. this article is utter trite.
don’t understand bit of it……. can any one explain me in single line??
Sarah, I’m not sure how you pursuaded Dr. Persaud to write here but well done, in a guest comment section that has been fairly meatless this month.
I suspect that this will appeal to, or at least interest, traders. There is a natural tendancy to ascribe the successful strategies to one’s own power over events, and failed trades to circumstances outside one’s control. Sometimes traders lapse into the mindset that every result is due to their own knowledge (or lack thereof), while others lapse into a sort of “market agnosticism,” believing that it is all randomness. Both are self-destructive.
The best traders recognize that both the upside and downside are a combination of personal and impersonal factors, and in equal measure (as in not skewing more to either side).
Any chance of getting Dr. Persaud to write regularly here, or do we have to start paying money for that?
@djm – I’m sure we could get Dr. Persaud to write more regularly, but he tends to be a fairly divisive choice, so we’ve gone for irregularity so far.
@anon1408
In summary, accept that there are some things you can influence and somethings you can’t but you must embrace both to succeed.
Its also good to see Dr Persaud acknowledging that basis of the article is based on someone else’s work. Lesson learned there Dr P!
Guess that my reply that also had a reference to plagiarism didn’t make it past the censors then!
@anon – it did, we were just a little slow in putting it up. It’s Friday afternoon.
Get Daniel Pink in, the Adventures of Johnny Bunko is by far my favourite career management manga comic.
Great article Raj. Did you write it?
and i thought i was just cr@p at my job!
life is like a box of chocolates – Forest Gump! So true!!
Such a good article! My ex boyfriend should read it so he would understand how he broke my whole life… chaos theory applies to personal life too ;( and as a precision I lost my job too so I understand very much the article
Very nice article – it reminds me of a video I watched on TED with Alain de Botton as speaker. It pointed out our lack of complete control over our careers. It is refreshing to see challenges from this point of view because all other career training drills focus way too much on what we SHOULD do. In reality, there is only THAT much you can do.
Excellent article! And so true in real life. When you are young and still studying you think you can change the world. Then you start working for a big blue chip organization, and you are stuck in organizational structures, until you either set up your own business or retire. You only need to make 1 bad decision you your career and it can set you back. Or be unlucky and have bad management. I would appreciate more of these articles!
Nothing new under the sun. The stoician school of thinking (Epictetus and Marcus Aurelianus as main thinkers) used to distinguish 2 types of events: those under our control, and the ones not under our control (disease, Act of God, brutality of the emperor, etc.). And their philosophy was to try to make people not worrying about the events not under their control.
Historians of Philosophy tell us that this philosophy was favoured by social conditions: the change of fortunes of individuals, after a wake of civil wars and mad emperors like Nero or caligula was so big, that this philosophy was chicken soup for souls.
Epicurian philosophs were also not that far from these conclusions.
2000 years later, this guy tries to look intelligent with the same idea and a modern chaos theory as a disguise, without quoting his sources for inspiration and that is the problem for me.
By the way, it is Christianity, who empowers the man, who finally won the wars of ideas in Roman Empire.