OUT OF LEHMAN: No job is safe

“An optimist is a banker who irons five shirts on a Sunday evening.” Though this is a stale joke by now, it casts light on the repercussions this Wall Street-induced crisis is having on the common man. For instance, since I was fired, I have cut down on some expenses, like buying the FT daily (London’s weather depresses me enough), extravagant dinners (take-away seems so yummy!) and, of course, laundry – one, I don’t use as many shirts these days, and two, I have tried to wash some of them myself. (If I had my way, I would love to share with you my newly acquired knowledge on which detergent works best for which kind of tap water, but for now, let me get back to the dirty laundry issue.)

As a banker, I was paid enough and I was prepared to be fired. However, a laundry man who does a good job and makes enough money to lead a contented life should feel terribly unlucky that his business is going down through no fault of his own. He didn’t earn as much money, didn’t take on excessive leverage or risk, and yet his occupation is inextricably linked to the vagaries of banking. How unfortunate!

So that brings me to the question – is any job safe?

I did two rotations during my 10-week summer internship at Lehman Brothers in 2007. The first was on a structuring desk in securitized (bad word, I know) finance, and the second five-week rotation was on an interest rate trading desk.

The second rotation was a disaster. I started just when the first signs of the credit crisis started to emerge. The senior trader refused to look me in the eye except when he urgently wanted a coffee or a sandwich from the cafeteria. I sat next to him for five weeks, researched on interest rate strategies and quietly stared at his trading screens all day. Since I never once asked a stupid question or mixed up his lunch order, he gave me a decent evaluation. But it was securitized finance which gave me the offer.

I turned that down and instead opted to return this year as a generalist associate. As the crunch worsened, I congratulated myself for my excellent foresight: I would probably have been laid off even before joining Lehman had I taken the securitized finance offer. By comparison, I considered that I’d opted for the ‘safe job’. But as it turned out, it wasn’t safe enough.

All through my brief stint at Lehman, every single senior manager whom we met during training told us – no better time to join this industry, don’t worry, you guys are fresh out of business school, you are a cheap resource, nobody will touch you. But we, the first-year associates, were the first to be fired by Lehman after they filed for bankruptcy.

That leads me to conclude that irrespective of where you are, when the stuff hits the fan, you, my friend, will be on the firing line. When you can’t see the light, don’t get all arrogant, the train might be right behind you!

Comments (12)
  1. Welcome to the real world – tenet 101:
    Always believe your senior manager when he tells you “don’t worry, .. nobody will touch you”

  2. Kid, you’ve been had. Hahahahahahaha

  3. safe job is in small IBK advisory shops now… boutique without balance sheet exposure are 100% safe… that’s the move if you don’t want any risk…

  4. If you were a generalist associate, why didn’t u a get a offer from Nomura?

  5. well thinking that a small boutique is SAFE, think again…Landsbanki capital markets seemed a ring fenced choice, but financial history taught us otherwise.

    i belive safety is not an adequate word to describe the risk/return profile of IBankers. if we want to be accurate what we shouild be looking at is the VAR.

    but again, even this measure can loose its quantitative meaning in this era.

  6. Huh, even informed and reasonably articulate guys like “ice” immediately above are now taking to spelling the word “lose” with two o’s.
    Makes it more and more likely that dictionaries will eventually recognize this increasingly popular “new usage.”
    A couple months ago I royally p’ed off the editor of ComputerWorld: upon seeing either “loose” or “looser” used in place of “lose” or “loser” in an EDITED ARTICLE (NOT blog comment) there, I emailed the editor inquiring whether this was a “new usage.” He wrote back starting off with something like “I can’t tell for sure if you’re sincere or if you are merely having at us, but I suspect it’s the latter…” Then went on to clarify that the word “loose” there was simply a typo error, nothing more, nothing less, and promptly corrected it.
    “Having at us”??? Isn’t that across-the-pond slang? So the editor of ComputerWorld’s a Brit? Who’d a thunk it?

  7. You deserve a pat on your back for your correction of grammer…. maybe you should go and become an english teacher?

  8. gadfly…how exactly are u contributing to the discussion about this guy who got fired from Lehman?

  9. I agree with Jimenez actually but unless Gadfly is american, he/she should realise that recognize is spelt with an S not a Z.

    Now what was this debate about again – oh yes Losers!

  10. I’m afraid VAR is meaningless. A statistical measure used to give comfort that taking highly leveraged positions was safe or without risk. Unfortunately the 1 in 1000 event has happened and the banking system is near collapse – time to rethink perhaps.

  11. Talented novelists now seem to be working at Efinancialcareers.

React

You can react by using a display name and your personal information will not be displayed.

Tell us your news

Email the editor with your feedback, news, tips or topics.